🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.